|

May 12, 2008
A Special Message
from Pittsburgh on the 2008 Presidential Election Campaigns
In a recent meeting of the
International Executive Board, concerns were raised about
the media’s ongoing attempts to sensationalize and
mischaracterize the contest between Senators Barack Obama
and Hillary Clinton to become the Democratic Party
presidential nominee. Most disturbing have been attempts to
define working people’s voting decisions in this contest as
somehow racially based, while completely ignoring the fact
that for years Senator McCain and many of his Republican
colleagues have treated all working people with complete
disdain, whether those workers are white, Black, Hispanic or
otherwise. Shouldn’t that be the issue for 2008, and
not this absurd and unfair focus on race and sometimes on
religion?
There is a lot of talk that
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is now fated to lose the
Democratic nomination and should pull out of the race. We
believe it is her right to stay in the fight and challenge
Senator Barack Obama as long as she has the desire and the
means to do so. That is the essence of democracy, and of the
Democratic Party process.
But we believe just as strongly
that Mrs. Clinton will be making a terrible mistake — for
herself, her Party and for the nation — if she continues to
press her candidacy through negative campaigning with
disturbing racial undertones.
America needs a clean break from
eight catastrophic years of George W. Bush, and it needs it
now. And so far, Senator John McCain is shaping up as simply
the “Bush Sequel” – with more war in Iraq, even more tax
cuts for the rich while the middle class struggles mightily,
and courts packed with even more right-wing activists intent
on undoing decades of progress in civil rights, civil
liberties and other vital areas. The Democratic Party must
field the most effective and vibrant candidate it possibly
can. And more attack ads and squabbling will not help
achieve that goal.
The IEB feels, therefore, that we
need to make it absolutely clear to our staff and local
leadership that both Democratic candidates would be far
superior advocates for the rights of working people and
their families than Senator McCain, and to make it equally
clear that neither Democrat should urge a choice based on
the race or the age of working-class voters. All
workers have a common need to be represented better than
they have been by George Bush or will be by John McCain,
whether he or she is a retiree, a worker in one of our
facilities, or one of the fine young men and women fighting
right now to protect our nation.
It’s bad enough that John
McCain’s supporters are already engaged in the politics of
divide and conquer, especially if Senator Obama is the
Nominee, which now seems likely. These destructive
Republican tactics are deeply troubling and completely
unfair, as Senator Obama’s grandparents, who raised him
during much of his youth, fought in World War II and worked
honorably in manufacturing jobs to support their family. And
they are deeply troubling because the Senator has pledged
his own undying allegiance to our country and to
working-class Americans, and because of his outspoken
commitment to a vibrant middle class which grows from the
bottom up and which recognizes that when it comes to
economic policies and trade, American workers must come
first.
Dividing working people along
racial and ethnic lines is the oldest and meanest game in
the book, and it is the one the Republicans are already
using to distract attention from the fact that Senator
McCain has made it abundantly clear that he offers nothing
more than a continuation of the Bush administration’s sorry
record of relentlessly assaulting the well-being and
interests of working people and of our nation’s unions.
John McCain is proposing a health
care “plan,” for example, that is a health care
industry-driven rehash of the approach that employers have
been trying to shove down our throats for years in
bargaining – and he is doing it with the full support of
Bush and their Republican cronies in Congress and the
insurance industry. John McCain has never seen a free
trade deal that he doesn’t love – and as a candidate he’s
already cheerleading for even more of them. He is
calling for more Bush-type tax cuts for the wealthy that are
creating the worst income inequality the country has seen
since 1928. He opposes the Employee Free Choice Act,
which Senator Obama supports for all workers, including for
part-time and contract employees. John McCain will keep
doling out subsidies to big oil. And he (along with
Senator Clinton, unfortunately) has pandered to working
people’s struggle to pay for rising gasoline prices by
calling for a microscopic “gas tax holiday” that will only
save working people pennies while robbing our country of the
funds needed to rebuild our failing infrastructure – which
is just one of the job-creating functions that our
government should be investing in instead.
Given these troubling
circumstances, the IEB urges all staff and local leadership
to share Senator McCain’s vicious anti-worker record with
our members, and to encourage them to understand that media
attempts to sensationalize differences among working people
based on race, ethnicity or religion will only distract us
from the real need to change our nation’s policies on health
care, trade, workers’ rights, energy and foreign affairs.
Getting that message out immediately to all our members and
supporters is crucial, and we must not let either the last
few days of the Democratic primary process or the everyday
McCain lies rob us of the chance to end the Bush assault on
us, our union and our families.
|
|
 |
| May 12,
2008 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
Asking the
Pentagon Why they Didn't Pick the Safest Possible Tanker
for the American Warfighter
Last Wednesday, I asked why the Air Force did not
choose the aerial refueling tanker that scored higher in
protecting its crew in a
speech on the Senate floor. Airbus's tanker scored
lower than Boeing's KC-767 in the contract competition
in the critical category of "survivability" which
measures the aircrafts ability to identify and avoid
threats and to protect the crew in the event of an
attack. -
"Compared to Boeing’s 767, Airbus’s
tanker is massive – it’s much bigger than the Air
Force originally requested and its size is
problematic for many reasons."
"Not only are there fewer places
Airbus’s tanker can take off and land – but as a
larger plane, it is a bigger target and easier to
hit. The KC-767 is more agile, and it’s safer
for the crews and the aircraft they are
refueling."
“Americans want our warfighters
flying the safest possible planes. So I’m
asking today – why wouldn’t the Pentagon?"
More
Last week, Senators Pat Roberts (R-KS),
Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) joined me
in writing a
letter to the Joint Chiefs of Staff to express our
concern that the recent KC-X contract was not awarded to
the refueling tanker that is "safest, most survivable,
and most effective for the American warfighter."
....................................................................................
In the News...
“Murray asks good questions about tanker” – Everett
Herald
....................................................................................
If this was forward to you, please
join this fight to ensure our economic and military
security. Sign up today so that we can keep you involved
and informed as the effort moves forward.

|
|
|
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Labor,
Lawmakers Continue Anti-Colombia ‘Free Trade’ Pact Drive
WASHINGTON (PAI)—Even though the anti-worker GOP Bush regime’s
controversial U.S.-Colombia “free trade”
agreement has been stalled--at least for now—organized
labor and its congressional allies are continuing their drive against
it.
Battle in Seattle -
watch the trailer
_____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stop Molesters
From:
Don
Brockett <d.brockett@comcast.net>
The child molesters have once again won the battle for the safety of
the children in our state!
The 2008 legislative session has adjourned. Legislators refused for the
fifth year in a row to take action on bills that would have eliminated
the criminal statutes of limitations for sex crimes committed against
children under the age of 18. Their inaction is inexcusable and should
disgust all citizens of Washington concerned with the safety of
children.
Because of this inaction by the legislators there will be little
deterrent for potential child molesters because none of the children
molested from now on will be able to prosecute their molester after the
present statutes of limitations run out in their case. Legislators
continue to reward molesters and re-victimize the vulnerable children.
If you disagree with this inaction, please immediately contact the
governor and your senators and representatives and let them know this is
unacceptable to you. If they have any concern for the safety and
protection of the children of our state, they will move swiftly to
re-introduce this legislation in the 2009 session and pass it
immediately. Get their commitment at election time this fall.
For further information, see the website
www.stopmolesters.org.
spokesman blog
Don
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stimulus
Payment Schedule for Tax Returns Processed by April 15
Economic stimulus payments will be issued
according to the last two-digits of the main filer's Social Security
number. People who use direct deposit also will be
among the first to receive the payments starting April 28. The first
cycle of paper checks will be mailed starting May 9 and continuing
through May 16.
2008
vehicles built by union members U.S and Canada

National Labor Committee
I.L.O
Stop Molesters
big box mart
Labor
History
Southwest Labor
History
Battle of Blair Mountain
NW Labor Press
Jobs with Justice
Oregon
USW local 3657
Welcome
to the United Nations
The Ship Breakers Of Bangladesh
Hurwitz's
painful victory Pyrrhic
(1) 1885, from
Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, who defeated Roman armies at Asculum,
280 B.C.E., but at such cost to his
own troops that he was unable to follow up and attack Rome itself,
and is said to have remarked, "one more such victory and we are lost."
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I'm
the master of low expectations.
George W. Bush, aboard Air Force One, June 2003
Do
you have blacks, too?
George W. Bush, to Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, November 2001
I
know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and
what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.
George W. Bush
If
the terriers and bariffs are torn down, this economy will grow.
George W. Bush
A
dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about
it.
George W. Bush
Anyway,
I'm so thankful, and so gracious - I'm gracious that my brother Jeb is
concerned about the hemisphere as well.
George W. Bush
Families
is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.
George W. Bush
First,
let me make it very clear, poor people aren't necessarily killers. Just
because you happen to be not rich doesn't mean
you're willing to kill.
George W. Bush
For
every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And,
folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just
unacceptable. And
we're going to do something about it.
George W. Bush
Home
is important. It's important to have a home.
George W. Bush
I
am a person who recognizes the fallacy of humans.
George W. Bush, on Oprah Winfrey Show, September 2000
I
firmly believe the death tax is good for people from all walks of life
all throughout our society.
George W. Bush
I
have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with
them.
George W. Bush
I
know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
George W. Bush
I
know how hard it is to put food on your family.
George W. Bush
I
promise you I will listen to what has been said here, even though I
wasn't here.
George W. Bush, speaking at President's Economic Forum, Waco, Texas,
August 2002
I
recently met with the finance minister of the Palestinian Authority, was
very impressed by his grasp of finances.
George W. Bush, Washington, May 2003
I
think anybody who doesn't think I'm smart enough to handle the job is
underestimating.
George W. Bush
I
think war is a dangerous place.
George W. Bush
I
understand small business growth. I was one.
George W. Bush
I
wish I wasn't the war president. Who in the heck wants to be a war
president? I don't.
George W. Bush
I'm
not a very good novelist. But it'd make a pretty interesting novel.
George W. Bush, Austin, Texas, December 2000
If
this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier - so long
as I'm the dictator.
George W. Bush
I'm
also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking
about myself, about why I do things.
George W. Bush, aboard Air Force One, June 2003
I'm
the commander - see, I don't need to explain - I do not need to explain
why I say things. That's the interesting thing about
being President.
George W. Bush, as quoted in Bob Woodward's Bush at War
|